Time Series Regression with Intervention Analysis

dc.contributor.authorMusci Hood, Jennifer Kay
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-26T20:11:10Z
dc.date.available2022-01-26T20:11:10Z
dc.date.updated2022-01-26T20:11:13Z
dc.description.abstractThis analysis is focused on time series modeling utilizing the ARIMA model, the ARIMA model with Intervention, and an extension of Dense Neural Networks for Intervention. The theory behind each method is explored in detail throughout the following chapters. In addition, the methods are applied to a constructed dataset reflecting monthly sales of fifty automobiles from January 2007 until February 2021. This analysis uses mean absolute percentage error, root mean square error, and mean square relative error to compare model results between the three methods. Overall, it was determined that the ARIMA model with Intervention performed better than the traditional ARIMA model when a pulse-response or step-response intervention is present. In addition, the ARIMA with Intervention Model and Dense Neural Network Model Extended for Intervention performed similarly for models where a pulse-response or step-response intervention is present. When determining which model to use, the benefits and drawbacks of dense neural networks are important to note. The benefits are that dense neural networks can model non-linear functions, the predictor data does not need to be stationary, and multiple predictor variables can be utilized within the model. On the contrary, dense neural networks are prone to over-fitting, underlying trends are not modeled as well as they are in traditional ARIMA models, and predictive capability for out-of-sample observations can be poor, due to nonlinear forecasting. The analysis in this research was completed with the combination of R version 4.0.3 and RStudio.
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.library.cofc.edu/handle/123456789/4367
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.titleTime Series Regression with Intervention Analysis
Files